Safety Certification Challenges: Difference between revisions
From Xen
Jump to navigationJump to search
Lars.kurth (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Lars.kurth (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
This page captures the efforts to certify Xen on ARM for ISO 26262 ASIL B. Discussions happen during the regular Xen on ARM Community Calls organized on xen-devel by Stefano Stabellini and Julien Grall. |
This page captures the efforts to certify Xen on ARM for ISO 26262 ASIL B. Discussions happen during the regular Xen on ARM Community Calls organized on xen-devel by Stefano Stabellini and Julien Grall. See [https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2018-04/threads.html#00325] for Minutes. |
||
We have identified the following requirements, all of them need an owner: |
We have identified the following requirements, all of them need an owner: |
||
* '''Code style requirements, a subset of MISRA''' |
* '''Code style requirements, a subset of MISRA''' |
||
::* Next step: find public documents that describe the code style requirements and publish them to xen-devel. |
::* Next step (Lars): find public documents that describe the code style requirements and publish them to xen-devel. |
||
* '''Create a subset of functions that need to go through certification''' |
* '''Create a subset of functions that need to go through certification''' |
||
::* Next step: create a small Kconfig for Xen as a reference, using Renesas Rcar as starting point. |
::* Next step (Stefano): create a small Kconfig for Xen as a reference, using Renesas Rcar as starting point. |
||
::* Start a discussion on which features we need to have. For instance real time schedulers might be required in some configurations but not all. |
::* Start a discussion on which features we need to have. For instance real time schedulers might be required in some configurations but not all. |
||
* '''Understand how to address dom0:''' |
* '''Understand how to address dom0:''' |
||
::* We need a plan for a non-Linux dom0 |
::* We need a plan for a non-Linux dom0. |
||
::: It looks like '''FreeRTOS''' dom0 could be a good option. |
|||
::* Next step: Find out more information about FreeRTOS on Xen. Reach out to people that worked on it (Dornerworks? Galois?). |
:::* Next step (Artem): Find out more information about FreeRTOS on Xen. Reach out to people that worked on it (Dornerworks? Galois?). |
||
::: An alternative may be a '''dom0-less''' option |
|||
::: Until now, we discussed this topic under the name of "create multiple guests from device tree". There are no patches (as far as I know), but it was submitted as the Xen on ARM project for Outreachy this year. |
|||
::: There are patches for a different project to setup shared memory regions from the xl config file (no need for grant table or xenbus support). |
|||
:::* Next step (Praveen Kumar): volunteered to investigate |
|||
* '''Create artifacts, such as docs, fault analysis, prove fault tolerance, safety management docs, document development processes.''' |
* '''Create artifacts, such as docs, fault analysis, prove fault tolerance, safety management docs, document development processes.''' |
||
::* Next step: find a company or a certification body that would guide us through the process. |
::* Next step: find a company or a certification body that would guide us through the process. |
||
Related conversations/minutes |
|||
* [https://markmail.org/message/ejbsfpcpstwkf4qa Re: Xen and safety certification, Minutes of the meeting on Apr 4th] |
|||
[[Category:OpenEmbedded]] |
[[Category:OpenEmbedded]] |
||
[[Category:Embedded]] |
[[Category:Embedded]] |
||
[[Category:Embedded and Automotive |
[[Category:Embedded and Automotive]] |
||
[[Category:Safety Certification]] |
[[Category:Safety Certification]] |
Latest revision as of 17:02, 14 May 2019
This page captures the efforts to certify Xen on ARM for ISO 26262 ASIL B. Discussions happen during the regular Xen on ARM Community Calls organized on xen-devel by Stefano Stabellini and Julien Grall. See [1] for Minutes.
We have identified the following requirements, all of them need an owner:
- Code style requirements, a subset of MISRA
- Next step (Lars): find public documents that describe the code style requirements and publish them to xen-devel.
- Create a subset of functions that need to go through certification
- Next step (Stefano): create a small Kconfig for Xen as a reference, using Renesas Rcar as starting point.
- Start a discussion on which features we need to have. For instance real time schedulers might be required in some configurations but not all.
- Understand how to address dom0:
- We need a plan for a non-Linux dom0.
- It looks like FreeRTOS dom0 could be a good option.
- Next step (Artem): Find out more information about FreeRTOS on Xen. Reach out to people that worked on it (Dornerworks? Galois?).
- An alternative may be a dom0-less option
- Until now, we discussed this topic under the name of "create multiple guests from device tree". There are no patches (as far as I know), but it was submitted as the Xen on ARM project for Outreachy this year.
- There are patches for a different project to setup shared memory regions from the xl config file (no need for grant table or xenbus support).
- Next step (Praveen Kumar): volunteered to investigate
- Create artifacts, such as docs, fault analysis, prove fault tolerance, safety management docs, document development processes.
- Next step: find a company or a certification body that would guide us through the process.
Related conversations/minutes