Paravirtualization (PV): Difference between revisions
Lars.kurth (talk | contribs) m (→Performance) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
== Performance == |
== Performance == |
||
[[File:XenPV.png|right| |
[[File:XenPV.png|thumb|right|500px|This figure shows how a Hardware driver interacts with the PV back-end and PV front-end.]] PV delivers higher performance than full virtualization because the operating system and hypervisor work together more efficiently, without the overhead imposed by the emulation of the system's resources. This makes a big difference for disk and network operations, where the use of PV network, bus and block device drivers enable near-native performance. Examples of devices which benefit from Paravirtualization and where drivers are available are block (disks), SCSI, USB, VGA and PCI devices. |
||
Architecturally, PV works by opening additional channels of communication between the hypervisors and the guest operating systems via PV front end and back end drivers as shown in the figure. |
Architecturally, PV works by opening additional channels of communication between the hypervisors and the guest operating systems via PV front end and back end drivers as shown in the figure. |
||
Revision as of 14:00, 20 April 2015
What is it?
Paravirtualization (PV) is an efficient and lightweight virtualization technique introduced by the Xen Project team, later adopted by other virtualization solutions. PV does not require virtualization extensions from the host CPU and thus enables virtualization on hardware architectures that do not support Hardware-assisted virtualization. However, PV guests and control domains require kernel support and drivers that in the past required special kernel builds, but are now part of the Linux kernel as well as other operating systems.
Performance
PV delivers higher performance than full virtualization because the operating system and hypervisor work together more efficiently, without the overhead imposed by the emulation of the system's resources. This makes a big difference for disk and network operations, where the use of PV network, bus and block device drivers enable near-native performance. Examples of devices which benefit from Paravirtualization and where drivers are available are block (disks), SCSI, USB, VGA and PCI devices.
Architecturally, PV works by opening additional channels of communication between the hypervisors and the guest operating systems via PV front end and back end drivers as shown in the figure.
PV and Linux (PVOPS)
As stated earlier, PV requires kernel support. In the Linux kernel, PV support is provided by the paravirt operations extensions (PVOPS) and PV front and back-end drivers that are shipped with Linux. PVOPS allows the kernel to determine at run-time, whether it is running under virtualization (Xen Project, KVM, VMI, etc.), which will prompt it to use optimized low-level operations for the specific virtualization stack. Xen Project Guest (DomU) support for Linux was introduced into the Linux kernel with version 2.6.24, whereas Xen Project Control Domain (Dom0) support was added from version 2.6.37. The key drivers have been added to Linux v 3.0 and since additional drivers and optimizations are added.
PV and Legacy Applications
Paravirtualization is a way to extend the life of legacy and custom applications that are only supported on older operating systems. Using Xen Project PV virtualization you can run these workloads on new, more powerful, energy-efficient hardware and save money in the long run.
Compatibility
The following links provide information about Xen and PV compatibility with various operating systems:
