XL vs Xend Feature Comparison: Difference between revisions

From Xen
Jump to navigationJump to search
(xm/xend does not support upstream-qemu, so fix the usb 1.1 passthru with qemu-upstream line)
(xm/xend does not support upstream-qemu, so fix the usb 1.1 passthru with qemu-upstream line (another line))
Line 89: Line 89:
|-
|-
|USB 1.1 device passthrough via hotplug (using upstream qemu)
|USB 1.1 device passthrough via hotplug (using upstream qemu)
|{{NotDone}}
|??
|{{NotDone}} <sup>[ [[#Foot3|3]] ]</sup>
|{{NotDone}} <sup>[ [[#Foot3|3]] ]</sup>
|-
|-

Revision as of 13:15, 6 January 2015

The following compares the featureset of the xend toolstack vs the xl toolstack as of Xen 4.2.

xm / xend xl
Guest Types
PV guests ✓ ✓
HVM guests ✓ ✓
Guest lifecycle operations
Create, shutdown, reboot ✓ ✓
Pause, unpause ✓ ✓
List, rename ✓ ✓
Live migration and save/restore ✓ ✓
Guest device support
Network devices (both para-virtualised and emulated) ✓ ✓
Block devices (both para-virtualised and emulated) ✓ ✓
Sharing storage across DomU's via w! in virtual machines configuration files ✓ ✗ [ 1 ]
Virtual framebuffer, keyboard and mouse (both para-virtualised and emulated) ✓ (includes SDL & VNC support) ✓ (includes SDL, VNC & SPICE support)
SPICE framebuffer/console support ✗ ✓
QXL graphics device support for SPICE ✗ ✗ [ 2 ]
PV console devices ✗ ✓
PCI device passthrough ✓ ✓
VGA graphics device (GPU) passthrough ✓ ✓
SCSI LUN/Host passthrough (PVSCSI) ✓ ✗ [ 2 ]
USB 1.1 device passthrough via config file (using qemu xen traditional) ✓ ✓
USB 1.1 device passthrough via config file (using upstream qemu) ✗ ✓
USB 1.1 device passthrough via hotplug (using qemu xen traditional) ✓ ✗ [ 3 ]
USB 1.1 device passthrough via hotplug (using upstream qemu) ✗ ✗ [ 3 ]
USB 2.0 device passthrough (PVUSB) ✓ ✗ [ 3 ]
Device Model Support
Qemu Xen Traditional Device Model ✓ ✓
Upstream Qemu Device Model ✗ ✓
Stub domain Qemu Xen Traditional Device Model ✓ ✓
Stub domain Upstream Qemu Device Model ✗ ✗ [ 2 ]
 
CPU pools ✓ (undocumented in XEND man pages) ✓
Cpupool-per-NUMA node. ✗ ✓
Control of CPU scheduler parameters ✓ ✓
TMEM ✓ ✓
XSM/Flash policy control ✓ ✓
Control of CPUID features exposed to guests. ✓ ✓ (syntax greatly improved)
 
Managed Domains ✓ ✗ [ 1 ]
Python code in configuration files ✓ ✗ [ 1 ]

[ 1 ] Feature is explicitly not supported by xl, see XL Anti-Features
[ 2 ] Feature will be exposed in a future release
[ 3 ] Feature development has started in the Xen 4.5 release cycle, but did not get completed

Also See:

Retrieved from "https://wiki.xenproject.org/index.php?title=XL_vs_Xend_Feature_Comparison&oldid=13513"