Talk:Dom0 Kernels for Xen: Difference between revisions
From Xen
Jump to navigationJump to search
m (Oops, forgot to put my sig.) |
ToddDeshane (talk | contribs) (attempt to answer question and generate discussion for fixes) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Question: Why are we duplicating the sections? Under Quick Start we have Distribs that have a dom0 kernel out of the box, 3rd party kernels, and dom0 support in other OSes. Then under detailed info, we have a list of dom0 kernels, both OotB & 3rd party. (Also, the list appears to be quite old.) - [[User:Kyl191|Kyl191]] 02:36, 27 November 2011 (UTC) |
Question: Why are we duplicating the sections? Under Quick Start we have Distribs that have a dom0 kernel out of the box, 3rd party kernels, and dom0 support in other OSes. Then under detailed info, we have a list of dom0 kernels, both OotB & 3rd party. (Also, the list appears to be quite old.) - [[User:Kyl191|Kyl191]] 02:36, 27 November 2011 (UTC) |
||
It looks like the intention is to help both the impatient (with the quick start) and also those that want to dig into the details (with a more detailed guide). Do you have specific suggestions for improvements? - [[User:ToddDeshane|ToddDeshane]] 01:12, 28 November 2011 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 01:14, 30 November 2011
Question: Why are we duplicating the sections? Under Quick Start we have Distribs that have a dom0 kernel out of the box, 3rd party kernels, and dom0 support in other OSes. Then under detailed info, we have a list of dom0 kernels, both OotB & 3rd party. (Also, the list appears to be quite old.) - Kyl191 02:36, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
It looks like the intention is to help both the impatient (with the quick start) and also those that want to dig into the details (with a more detailed guide). Do you have specific suggestions for improvements? - ToddDeshane 01:12, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
