Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"
(Note: at bottom of Main_Page needs revision.) |
(→wiki.XenServer.org: Yes, good sense.) |
||
(5 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== wiki.XenServer.org == |
== wiki.XenServer.org == |
||
"Note: Documentation about XCP is now hosted on wiki.XenServer.org" |
"Note: Documentation about XCP is now hosted on wiki.XenServer.org" |
||
− | According to https://xenserver.org/, |
+ | <br />According to https://xenserver.org/, |
− | "Notice: XenServer.org has been decommissioned as of March 31, 2019. This new landing page provides links to Citrix Hypervisor content and resources available on citrix.com and developer.citrix.com." |
+ | <br />"Notice: XenServer.org has been decommissioned as of March 31, 2019. This new landing page provides links to Citrix Hypervisor content and resources available on citrix.com and developer.citrix.com." |
− | I don't know where to reference XCP so the Note at the bottom of Main Page is useful. |
+ | <br />I don't know where to reference XCP so the Note at the bottom of Main Page is useful. |
− | Perhaps someone else can provide an edit for that Note? |
+ | <br />Perhaps someone else can provide an edit for that Note? |
<br />[[User:GarveyPatrickD|GarveyPatrickD]] ([[User talk:GarveyPatrickD|talk]]) 14:51, 9 August 2019 (UTC) |
<br />[[User:GarveyPatrickD|GarveyPatrickD]] ([[User talk:GarveyPatrickD|talk]]) 14:51, 9 August 2019 (UTC) |
||
+ | |||
+ | --[[User:Lars.kurth|Lars.kurth]] ([[User talk:Lars.kurth|talk]]) 15:10, 9 August 2019 (UTC) We should just remove that note. |
||
+ | <br />----[[User:GarveyPatrickD|GarveyPatrickD]] ([[User talk:GarveyPatrickD|talk]]) 15:17, 9 August 2019 (UTC) So, XCP doesn't exist anymore? |
||
+ | <br />------[[User:Lars.kurth|Lars.kurth]] ([[User talk:Lars.kurth|talk]]) 15:23, 9 August 2019 (UTC) XCP itself was superseded by XenServer.org. The only thing which still exists re XCP is historical. XenServer is still open source, but Citrix never had a taste for doing this properly as open source. As a consequence a few community members created https://xcp-ng.org/, which by the looks of it will soon become an official part of the Xen Project (see https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2019-07/msg01453.html). At that point we can replace most of the XCP/XenServer content with XCP-ng content. Does this make sense? |
||
+ | <br />--------[[User:GarveyPatrickD|GarveyPatrickD]] ([[User talk:GarveyPatrickD|talk]]) 18:07, 9 August 2019 (UTC) Thank you, it makes excellent sense. |
Revision as of 18:07, 9 August 2019
Pleas consider upgrading to a more recent version of MediaWiki. Current is 1.20.2 I believe; a number of security fixes as well as new features have been added since the version in sue here, 1.15. Thanks. -- ArielGlenn 09:48, 24 March 2013 (UTC)
wiki.XenServer.org
"Note: Documentation about XCP is now hosted on wiki.XenServer.org"
According to https://xenserver.org/,
"Notice: XenServer.org has been decommissioned as of March 31, 2019. This new landing page provides links to Citrix Hypervisor content and resources available on citrix.com and developer.citrix.com."
I don't know where to reference XCP so the Note at the bottom of Main Page is useful.
Perhaps someone else can provide an edit for that Note?
GarveyPatrickD (talk) 14:51, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
--Lars.kurth (talk) 15:10, 9 August 2019 (UTC) We should just remove that note.
----GarveyPatrickD (talk) 15:17, 9 August 2019 (UTC) So, XCP doesn't exist anymore?
------Lars.kurth (talk) 15:23, 9 August 2019 (UTC) XCP itself was superseded by XenServer.org. The only thing which still exists re XCP is historical. XenServer is still open source, but Citrix never had a taste for doing this properly as open source. As a consequence a few community members created https://xcp-ng.org/, which by the looks of it will soon become an official part of the Xen Project (see https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2019-07/msg01453.html). At that point we can replace most of the XCP/XenServer content with XCP-ng content. Does this make sense?
--------GarveyPatrickD (talk) 18:07, 9 August 2019 (UTC) Thank you, it makes excellent sense.