This is a list of open work items and known bugs for the Xen on ARM with virtualization extension project.
In progress
Known Bugs
General
Domain 0 memory limitation due to 1:1 mapping
The use of the 1:1 workaround for dom0's memory (needed on platforms without an I/O SMMU, which is currently all) limits the maximum size of dom0. By carefully positioning the Xen and initial kernel/initrd/dtb binaries at the top of RAM dom0 is able to make use of up to 1/2 of the host RAM. The remainder is available for guest use. In general dom0 should be made quite small anyway. For more information see:
* http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2013-12/msg02239.html
* http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-01/msg00885.html
This should be addressed in a future release by supporting multiple memory banks for dom0.
Versatile Express
Arndale Board
Open Work Items
Save/restore and migration
PCI device assignment to DomUs
Contact: xen-devel@lists.xen.org |
Description: Assign one or more devices to an unprivileged guest, re-program the SMMU accordingly. |
References: Not specified, useful references. |
Expose Wallclock time to guests
Contact: xen-devel@lists.xen.org |
Description: Current Xen on ARM does not popular the wallclock time fields of the shared info with anything useful. It should do so... |
References: Not specified, useful references. |
More flexible early printk support
Contact: xen-devel@lists.xen.org |
Description: Allow a single Xen binary to support multiple platforms for early_printk
Rather than parsing the DTB early in asm to get the command line it would probably be sufficient to have a magic hex byte at a specific offset which could be edited by a simple tool. |
References: http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2014-02/msg01880.html |
Support for DT /chosen/stdout-path node
VCPU virtual time support
Contact: xen-devel@lists.xen.org |
Description: Currently the concept of virtual time exposed to the guests is very simplistic and is just a static offset from physical time based on the time when the guest was started. We need to consider if this is actually what is needed/wanted and consider cases such as stolen time etc. |
References: A patch series was sent to the LKML but never fully upstreamed: http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=138929238127454&w=2 |